Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Tomas

- April 19, 2021, 09:21:32

Thank you very much for this and RN10Pro recent reviews. Hoping Galaxy A52 is the next on your to be reviewed list, as these 3 are on my shortlist for my next phone.
I'm curious about your display PWM testing, looking at Realme 8 Pro results (114 Hz through all brightness levels) and remarks it seems the flickering is really bad on this one. However I've seen several Youtube reviewers test it with Radex Lupin pulsemeter and PWM results were actually on par with RN10Pro, I'm attaching a picture of their results - imgur.com/6jEBiRp . Can you explain why such a difference? I often use phone in complete dark and eyes are pretty sensitive to flickering, so not sure what to believe here. Thank you in advance!

Posted by Redaktion

- April 19, 2021, 05:04:10

Realme installs a 108-megapixel camera in its 8 Pro and enables fancy photo effects like tilt-shift and pictures of the starry night sky. However, the latest cellular standard is missing, which limits the future viability somewhat.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Realme-8-Pro-smartphone-review-Lightweight-300-euro-phone-without-5G.533154.0.html

News:

Post reply

Topic summary

Posted by Tomas

Posted by Redaktion