When comparing low-power LCDs used by users who place importance on battery life, isn't it necessary to compare the power consumption of panels as well?

for example

Innolux N140HCG-GQ2
3.05W (Max.)

NE140FHM-N61
2.4 / 2.8W (Typ./Max.)

Isn't the worst panel in your article the best when it comes to power consumption?

Accroding to panelook.com some of the the LG and Innolux panels contrast ratio is 800 - completely different than what you stated/measured. What can be the reason?

thank you

is a innolux panel on T495 compatible with X1C7? i want to replace my fucking BOE FHD panle with better one.

Does anyone know where to buy the Innolux panel other than Alibaba where sellers require bulk orders (10+)?

Quote from: Deee on July 30, 2019, 11:49:07
Where can you find your panel number without disassembling the screen casing?

Yes, on Windows download HWiNFO .com
Monitor > Lenovo > Monitor Name (Manuf): ***
Linux
Easy enough with strings /sys/class/drm/card0-eDP-1/edid
Your panel model ID will be the last line of the output

Quote from: Anonym on July 30, 2019, 18:42:58

Quote from: S.Yu on July 30, 2019, 13:23:54
I gotta ask, why?? Why not just give better panels to relatively expensive models and worse panels to relatively cheap models of the same size??

It's easy to understand when you look at the IBM history. The objective is to never stall the production line due to a supply issue in one manufacturer, and this does just that. If they started allocating specific screens to specific models, they would have to halt production of that computer model when the supplier of that screen had a delay or was out of stock.

The real criticism here is that there are more screen manufacturers which could deliver more similar quality screens (higher quality even) than their current selection. Samsung does come to mind.

Thanks, that does make sense.

Quote from: S.Yu on July 30, 2019, 13:23:54
I gotta ask, why?? Why not just give better panels to relatively expensive models and worse panels to relatively cheap models of the same size??

It's easy to understand when you look at the IBM history. The objective is to never stall the production line due to a supply issue in one manufacturer, and this does just that. If they started allocating specific screens to specific models, they would have to halt production of that computer model when the supplier of that screen had a delay or was out of stock.

The real criticism here is that there are more screen manufacturers which could deliver more similar quality screens (higher quality even) than their current selection. Samsung does come to mind.

Don't want to be a PITA, but should you update the title from 3 Panels to 4 ?

I gotta ask, why?? Why not just give better panels to relatively expensive models and worse panels to relatively cheap models of the same size??

Where can you find your panel number without disassembling the screen casing?

There is another combination
Lenovo i7 + MX250 + N140HCG-GQ2 

The backlight color temp is definitely NOT better with higher temperature. It should top out at 6500K.  Any higher implies that they are using crappy blue-ish LEDs. All that extra blue light is also going to give you eye problems later on.

Beware that in the compsarison table, the CCT (correlated color temperature) row green highlight coloring seems confusing.

If 6500K is ideal white, then 7000K is too blue.  So the most saturated green background highlights the worst value in this row, but in other rows the most saturated green background highlights the best value.

United States Lenovo site shows T495 only with 250 nits FHD IPS monitor, and no other choices.

Finally something where Ryzen laptops shine and are not hindered :)