Do you know how to stop Intel/AMD race wars?

Rob random shops, burn cars and play the generation butterfly victim when someone calls the police.

Quote from: Kindergarten World on January 24, 2021, 14:49:01
Look at the comments below.
Wow.

Projection is the new hotness amongst shills.
"Look at these crazy people pointing out true information! I am sane; believe the FUD in the article". 🤦‍♂️

A single-digit single-core advantage is meaningless, even for games. a ~50-60% multi-core advantage, on the other hand, will be useful for *a lot* of people.

Quote from: Ali AMD fanboy on January 25, 2021, 11:42:13
For those who says, Intel just faster 2%.

Read again the topic. It compares i7 with Ryzen 9 (AMD's top processor)

Laptops with Ryzen 9 will cost more than 2.5k$. while Intel is about 1.2k$.

Absolute nonsense on the costs - the GPU is the primary factor there. More importantly, the drop in single-core from Ryzen 9 to Ryzen 7 is going to be in the vicinity of a couple of percent, so feel free to compare those. Finally, that's still the best Intel have to offer right now, no matter what they call it.

I do agree that people should "stop being fanboy", ideally by not posting junk comments like yours.

bruh what are you saying, the tuf dash 15 with that i3-spec-ed i7 is more expensive(1539 euros inc. vat) then a strix g15(1395 euros inc. vat) with 5900hx with 3060 in my country... and that 3060 is on par or probably faster then the 3070 in the dash cause that one is a lower powered 3070 which is marketed as maxq still for some reason... you just pulled those prices out of your butt lol

For those who says, Intel just faster 2%.

Read again the topic. It compares i7 with Ryzen 9 (AMD's top processor)

Laptops with Ryzen 9 will cost more than 2.5k$. while Intel is about 1.2k$.

So, if me, I will not pay 1.3k$ more for just 30% multicore. Coz it's literally don't worth it. Stop being fanboy, and look at the face of reality, don't fall to advertisements.

"for those who only cares about single core performance"... gawd,
are you drunk?

My 4c//8t CPU is beginning to show that you need more cores. Single core performance is increasingly irrelevant as long as we're not talking huge disparity. This headline about a 2% single core lead is irresponsible reporting.

Intel CPU is a hot mess.. My Dell 5590 i7 9750H is a hot mess when playing games and is making the experience bad.. Intel doesn't innovate just stupid GHZ that no laptop can get.. 90% of using the laptop is thermal throttle so stop the laying propaganda.. We don't want stupid GHZ on laptops we need decent experience.. If i want the fastest GHZ i will by Desktop.. I hope reviewers understand that.  :o

Nothing brings out the trolls faster than a good old Intel/AMD comparison.
What a bunch of clowns

The price, really, the price.
But ultimately it's not up to Intel but to manufacturers about how to price the mobile parts, the bulk prices are miniscule compared to what's ultimately charged against end users, they could cut their margins for the CPU alone and sort things out.

Look at the comments below.
Wow.

Quote from: toven on January 24, 2021, 12:27:44

Quote from: Grinnie Jax on January 24, 2021, 11:31:59

Quote from: toven on January 24, 2021, 09:01:32
They should release duo core Tigerlake and claim single core king. Intel fanboy just care about gaimg so 2c/4t with the same price of 6c/12t Zen3 would be enough for them.

This was relevant several years ago. Current games prefer 6/12 CPUs, less that doesn't deliver smooth framerate. Assassin's Creed Valhalla, for instance, requires at least six CPU cores/threads; anything lower than that will introduce multiple stuttering issues.

I totally agree with you. It's Intel who slash their cores this generation and try to claim 2% single core performances.

Intel appeared in a silly situation when it can't offer anything to customers, except slashing prices, which they don't like doing at all. Mobile CPUs are inferior to the competitor, both power and efficiency-wise. (Upcoming!) Desktop CPUs are ridiculous power-hogs, where they had to reduce core-count compared to current-gen, just to keep it within more or less adequate power envelope. But AMD CPUs are night and day efficiency-wise. Server CPUs are a nightmare as well. Intel has to come up with some great architecture, otherwise, I see no reason in getting Intel CPUs at all.

Quote from: Grinnie Jax on January 24, 2021, 11:31:59

Quote from: toven on January 24, 2021, 09:01:32
They should release duo core Tigerlake and claim single core king. Intel fanboy just care about gaimg so 2c/4t with the same price of 6c/12t Zen3 would be enough for them.

This was relevant several years ago. Current games prefer 6/12 CPUs, less that doesn't deliver smooth framerate. Assassin's Creed Valhalla, for instance, requires at least six CPU cores/threads; anything lower than that will introduce multiple stuttering issues.

I totally agree with you. It's Intel who slash their cores this generation and try to claim 2% single core performances.

Quote from: toven on January 24, 2021, 09:01:32
They should release duo core Tigerlake and claim single core king. Intel fanboy just care about gaimg so 2c/4t with the same price of 6c/12t Zen3 would be enough for them.

This was relevant several years ago. Current games prefer 6/12 CPUs, less that doesn't deliver smooth framerate. Assassin's Creed Valhalla, for instance, requires at least six CPU cores/threads; anything lower than that will introduce multiple stuttering issues.

They should release duo core Tigerlake and claim single core king. Intel fanboy just care about gaimg so 2c/4t with the same price of 6c/12t Zen3 would be enough for them.