Quote from: ilikegames on January 19, 2021, 16:20:44Samsung probably never had the capacity in the first place but I don't believe the supply situation would be relieved on more advanced nodes, yield issue obviously.
Nvidia's Ampere Architecture really amped me up, lol. Jokes aside, it is evident that the mighty beast 320 watt RTX Geforce 3080 is now showing its weakness. When you built the product on a older node just to save "money", the burdens of "performance hit" & "supply shortage" will be carried onto customers as a result. Rumours insinuate that Nvidia wanted a price cut from TSMC and that's why, they stated to produce their GPUs under Samsung 8nm Node but TSMC being TSMC didn't budge and Nvidia is paying for that blunder. Well, technically, consumers are facing the problems at the end of the day. (High power required, low performance per watt, lower yield due to chips being very large and other countless issues that comes when not calculating the after-effects.)
Quote from: John Doe on January 12, 2021, 15:43:59Yeah now if you'll look past the 3080 then the others are all much closer, and remember that a previous famous estimate was that the 3080 would scale linearly down to 70W, this is far better than that, being less than half the TGP at 70% the performance.
Better than expected? Looking at the 3dMark Time Spy chart, 2080 Super Desktop was like 10% faster than 2080 Super Mobile, while 3080 Desktop is 45% faster than 3080 Mobile. Given the results, the 3080 Mobile should have been labeled as 3070 Mobile instead.