Quote from: Ricci Rox on January 09, 2021, 22:48:52
Quote from: splus on January 09, 2021, 22:09:20
Quote from: Ricci Rox on January 09, 2021, 10:49:04
That's not true at all, though?
The Mi Note 10, Mi 10, Mi 10T, Mi 11 use the HMX. The limitations of the HMX are well-known at this point.
The S20 Ultra and Note 20 Ultra use the HM1 which has nonacell binning.
No, Note 20 Ultra uses the exact same HMX sensor. It just bins it to 12MP (1:9), whereas xiaomi bins it to 27MP (1:4).
HM1 and HM2 sensors are smaller in size even though they're also 108MP, made for cheaper phones.
Some simple research would tell you that you're wrong. :)
Mi Note 10, Mi 11, Mi 10, Mi 10T: HMX
S20 Ultra, Note 20 Ultra: HM1
Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G: HM2 (midrange)
There's a reason why Xiaomi moved to a 48 MP sensor on the Mi 10 Ultra, and a short trip to YouTube would show that it handily outperforms all Xiaomi's HMX phones.
The HMX is no longer a great sensor. It's worse than the HM1, the GN1, and the OV48C on the Mi 10 Ultra. Even the 12 MP IMX555 on the S20/+ is a better sensor, talk less of the IMX700 on the P40 Pro.
I really don't know where you get the idea that the HM1 is better than HMX?? You're the only person ever who claims that.
And yes, as the previous comment says, the HM1 is basically the same as the HMX, just has different 9:1 binning.
If you read and watch many various camera comparisons (in depth and with high res photos to compare the details) between Note Ultra 20 and Mi 10 Pro or Mi 10T Pro, you'll see that both Mi's have MUCH better picture quality (I'm talking about the main camera, not zoom or ultrawide).
In short, and to agree with everyone else here - the claim that the HMX sensor is "aging" is not just innacurate, but it's so "rolls eyes" kind of a comment that it cannot be taken seriously.
And it's also lowering the repuatition of this site, which is known for its amazing in depth reviews.