4gb of vram for the 3050?And just 6 for 3050ti??
Come on...I am a low budget gamer and this makes those cards very unatractive or...useless...

The article doesn't say the "performance difference" is too wide. It says the "gap" is too wide. This could mean the price, or the VRAM offering, both of those would be very true. The 3090 is simply not compelling at $1,500 to most buyers. $1,000 for performance close to it would be.

Ok, i gotta call shenanigans. The article says, 'the performance difference between the 3080 and the 3090 is too wide...', in what universe? There's a whopping 10-15% perf difference between the 2. Besides, the memory controller is a part of the sm, so having the cuda count with a cut down bus just does not work with their architecture. Also, that card would totally cannibalize the sales of the 3090, so unless they plan on re-writing the drivers for the 3090 and actually making it a 'titan' class card, then it makes no sense. Besides, call a duck a duck. They are releasing this card and shoehorning into their product stack because amd actually gives them a run for their money in rasterization for once in a great while. I'm not saying the rumors are true for the specs, but if they are Nvidia is duuuuumb.

The 3060 6GB if around 300USD seams like a good card for 1080p, expecting it to be made by TSMC 7nm already whishfull thinking probably.

Cps

Great.  More crap we can't buy at MSRP. Call me in 2022.