Quote from: RinzImpulse on December 06, 2020, 05:19:21
Nah, It won't be comparable to desktop 3070. It will be limited by power consumption that I can only assume only comparable to 3060/Ti or lower
Indeed. Given that the desktop 3070 needs ~220W to do its thing, I can't see how the mobile variant would get the same performance in a ~150W power envelope - I'd expect to see performance a little below the desktop 360Ti. The inevitable ~120W "Max-Q" variants are going to be an interesting exercise in convincing fools to part with their money.
Also, in the article:
"It would be strange for NVIDIA to sell mobile GPU with 60% more VRAM than its desktop namesake"
Not even slightly. I only recently stopped using a laptop with a GTX 980M (in terms of specs, an under-clocked desktop GTX 970) with 8GB of RAM - 100% more than either the 980 or 970 on desktop. Nvidia know full well that they can sell mobile chips that under-perform their label to consumers by sticking on far more RAM than the chip can ever use; they have a long and storied history of doing so, with a brief but welcome intermission in the Pascal era. It's sad to see they're back on their bullshit.