Quote from: toven on December 04, 2020, 13:37:27
Comparing chips in the similar price range totally makes sense to me.

I don't know about where you live, but around here, the 10900K is much cheaper than 5950X. It's cheaper than 5900X as well. I doubt the 11900K is going to be much more expensive. Especially as it will lose two cores over its predecessor. As was said, games typically can't really make use of 16 cores. Actually, it can be a disadvantage to have too many cores. 5950X should be the AMD gaming champ as it should offer the highest boost IIRC (it probably gets the best dies), not because it has the most cores. However, in the Intel's camp, 600K tends to be a solid choice for gamers, offering very good boost and strong single threaded performance at a lower price. It's not all about the 900K.

Bruh people saying comparing a 16 core to an 8 core isnt fair but it games won't scale above 8 cores it really matters on single core

Quote from: jey on December 04, 2020, 12:17:06
Lmao comparing a 8 core to a 16 core... classic. Why every article ridden with bias on Notebookcheck these days.

Comparing chips in the similar price range totally makes sense to me.

Lmao comparing a 8 core to a 16 core... classic. Why every article ridden with bias on Notebookcheck these days.