NBC articles most often compare new Intels against old Intels only and new AMDs against old AMDs. Now that AMD is leaping ahead for quite some time consistently, we want the article to compare how the new Intel CPU does against a comparable AMD without pulling up old articles and benchmark charts from other sites.

Quote from: Nikhil on November 27, 2020, 05:21:42
So, they are not gonna talk about that ryzen 4700u already outperform these yet to be released intel processors 🙃 and the rumoured benchmark shows ryzen 5700u single thread performance above 1600 points and multicore above 6400 in geekbech 🙃

Rumor by amd fanboy 🙃 which is just dreaming to beating intel tigerlake 1500 score on geekmark. You should know 5700U is only refreshed version of zen2 renoir. The performance will around ~1100, and 5800U will around ~1400. It will not more than ryzen 5 5600X desktop version score.

4 cores? Jeeez, Intel will have a difficult future when ARM and AMD keep rising the bar.

Funny I actually own a HP Spectre with 10nm 1065G7 and 4k panel. Despite the advertised 20 hrs battery life, it only lasts 6-7 after various tweaks.
The all core boost 3.5 GHz is doable, but it draws 39W and barely maintains the temp even with liquid metal. Also HP's fan profiles are just so dumb.

I think it's time for a intel to rename their whole lineup of processors, there's no way a higher up at intel looked at these names like the "i7 1180G7KFCBBQ" and thought that it was perfectly fine

Do any person buys AMD now because their products are good rather than because they hate Intel company? Before, nobody did it... I guess most nonsense from AMD fans only impresses kids... HP made a laptop in 14nm+++ using Intel whiskey lake w/ 4k panel lasts upto 17 hours, now, you know why all AMD laptops are FHD?? It doesn't have good battery life. Intel is 14nm+++ & can compete core by core compared to AMD 7nm, don't believe Top threshold Power consumption of Intel vs AMD, the average of Intel is the same as AMD, unless you tell me don't know Intel 14nm+++ CPUs use 1/4 idle power (& 1/9 iGPU power myself calculated) compared to AMD 7nm????? Still applaud AMD FHD max displays laptops...



Thanks!

"Don't be fooled by that "15W" marketing gimmick. Intel's 15W apus usually suck more power than any 25W Ryzen apus."

This exactly, but the same is true for AMD chips.

Reviewers need to compare the performance and power efficiency of
Ryzen 7 5800HS "35W" to Core i7-1185G7 "28W", and
Ryzen 7 5800U "25W" to Core i7-1180G7 "15W" and Apple M1 "11W"
in a laptop's both 'standard' and 'ultimate' modes, same applying to Ryzen 3 and 5.

So, they are not gonna talk about that ryzen 4700u already outperform these yet to be released intel processors 🙃 and the rumoured benchmark shows ryzen 5700u single thread performance above 1600 points and multicore above 6400 in geekbech 🙃

Don't be fooled by that "15W" marketing gimmick. Intel's 15W apus usually suck more power than any 25W Ryzen apus.

Just check recent Dell Latitude 9510 review - almost 50W average and almost 100W max consumption from "15W" APU. If really pack it into 15W, it will boost around <1.3GHz all core :)

It's funny how paid for and biased reviews/news stopped mentioning AMD counterparts... >:Gad

But how well does this i7 stack against Ryzen 5800HS with 8C/16T and 35W power envelope?
More premium thin and light ultrabooks like the Lenovo's own Yoga Slim 7 Pro are going to have 5600/5800HS and Nvidia MX450 graphics with accelerated Cuda.
Can Intel's "EVO platform" and "XE graphics" really hold a candle to AMD's offering? At this point I doubt it.