userbenchmark sucks!!!!

Does anyone know about any alternatives to this site?
And how do you compare hardware today?(besides from youtube reviews)
thanks

So, if AMD can fix a scheduling issue facing windows then AMD will gain 2%-4% above Intel here. As it is most of the samples on these benchmark sites are not properly showing 5950x's that are running at 5.12ghz and 4.97ghz.

Quote from: Ryan Waldron on November 12, 2020, 14:55:27
The difference being that Intel will be charging 4 times the price for a few percent performance gain. Amazing the kind of money people will spend to satisfy their own ego.

Who charges 4 times the price for the Intel? Are you high?

The difference being that Intel will be charging 4 times the price for a few percent performance gain. Amazing the kind of money people will spend to satisfy their own ego.

If you want an impartial alternative, try Hardlimit Benchmark.

$#@###2026

UserBenchmark captured my interest some time ago. But their fight against Ryzen is more and more apparent. At first, they started reducing the impact of core count on the result, and back then the weighting algorithm was still public. Then they reduced it further, later they made it private. They are more and more obscure, and not trustworthy at all, anymore.

Furthermore, feel free to read their "reviews" of the CPUs. In case of Ryzen 5 5600X, I haven't read a worse pile of bullcrap for quite some time, when I consider things that are published as "reviews". They're even recommending i5-9600K as a substitute for the far better Ryzen SKU.

All these hate comments show is that people don't know how to fucking read and will spew hate towards anything lmao

Do you have nothing better to do?

Sounds like to me that the user benchmark people are in cahoots with Intel or that the person who wrote this article is an Intel fanboy who's trying to bash AMD and can't just accept the fact that AMD is kicking Intel's a** just the same as the president can't admit that he lost to Joe Biden

Quote from: VEGGIM on November 10, 2020, 20:03:44

Quote from: Rinnn on November 10, 2020, 18:46:32
UserBenchmark is a joke of a site for quite awhile and is usually heavily criticized both by fans and tech Youtubers for its Intel bias. I have seen core i3 cpus scoring higher than Ryzen 7 on that site as well. Wouldn't be surprised if Intel actually owns Userbenchmark.

I doubt that would be the case. It's banned from the r/intel subreddit as well. I dont think something that heavily promotes intel, would be banned from the r/intel subreddit. it doesn't make sense.

They don't need it on there. It adds credibility to Intel that they are banned, and makes people think like you just did.

Userbenchmark has high Google results, and caters to people that don't know anything about computers. So it doesn't matter if it's on cpu reddits, the people there wouldnt fall for their obvious BS anyway. Userbenchmark just needs to mislead more "gullible" people.

Wtf?! Literally false. Fake news...
Dumbass writer must have had a stroke and couldn't research a single thing...

I would probably re-evaluate the title of the article.  The title doesn't clearly convey what the article's subject actually is.

The same thing happened to nvidia 30 series. Where the 3090 averaged a 190 iirc (2080 ti was about 170).

I guess we should wait till they fix the scoring problem.

Well, just from the headline it sounds as if they are trying to bash AMD, but reading the article it becomes obvious they're actually trying to bash UserBenchmark which published BS scores.