The only more or less trustworthy benchmark for CPU right now is Cinebench. Both CB15 & CB20.

Why does this benchmark indicate that the 5950 is only running at 4.5ghz? AMD has already stated that the 5950 can do 4.9ghz. In fact, AMD was touting the highest speeds ever on their chips at 4.9ghz. That was one of the biggest features for the 5950. Somehow now it can only do 4.5ghz on this benchmark? That's very convenient for Intel.

Quote from: TiffanyO on November 03, 2020, 13:13:55
This website is going to loose credibility if it keeps using userbenchmark (if it already hasn't). Userbenchmark has been known to be bias  It's also not even a real benchmark. I would just ban the author of this post, as he doesn't know wtf he's talking about anyway.

Well, thank you. Next time, I think it helps to read the article completely before getting all riled up. Good day :)

This website is going to loose credibility if it keeps using userbenchmark (if it already hasn't). Userbenchmark has been known to be bias  It's also not even a real benchmark. I would just ban the author of this post, as he doesn't know wtf he's talking about anyway.

I stopped using this platform as a benchmarking tool years ago. It is such a  poorly executed program. If you merely leave a small background program open it will vastly change the results, miss the mark, greatly exaggerate results etc take your pick. If you simply want a close enough  comparison of your set up then it is fine. But by no means should you ever use this to glean exacting results.  These phantom benchmark results are fodder for the fool's. Don't be a fool.

Please don't ever use userbenchmark as a source guys, they have shown time and time again to be complete Intel shills and to change benchmarks in order to let them come out in top.

Considering that Zen 3 wins 5% overall score in Intel-fanboy benchmark... Intel may just skip Rocket Lake and start preparing a new architecture.

UserBenchmark? Again??? No further comments