News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by IDooMI
 - October 18, 2020, 09:15:37
4k 144hz when there is not a GPU that can run that much HZ unless you play esports games. No triple AAA game.

Maybe in 2 more gens we can see 120hz 4k and this monitor being actually Worth at 1500 dollar price.
Posted by Thundra74
 - October 17, 2020, 12:45:54
well absence of hdmi 2.1 were a miss type ! look at asus spec on pubblicity ! its reported hdmi 2.1.
Althought >3000€ is completely no sense!
Posted by Mike78
 - October 17, 2020, 07:34:45
Display manufacturers have lost the plot.
Either that, or they pay for everyday items with gold nuggets.
More than 6k for a monitor that doesn't even offer HDMI 2.1 or pixel level illumination control?? I'll give it a miss.
The only logical reason for the staggering price is so that they can still charge 2-3k for even lesser displays...
Posted by Thrillbo Baggins
 - October 17, 2020, 03:32:22
They are out of their minds.  Over $6000 and it doesn't support HDMI 2.1?!  That's complete insanity. 

* This monitor is 10bit / 144hz / 4k
* Displayport 1.4 is 32.4Gbs
* 10bit / 144hz / 4k @ 4:4:4 requires ~48Gbps

I would have paid a lot for this monitor but without HDMI 2.1, it's significantly worse.  I'd pay $1500.

www.avforums.com/attachments/1581008668293-png.1254816
Posted by Lol
 - October 17, 2020, 02:04:35
3600$ and no HDMI 2.1 or display port 2.0? Like wtf. Monitor should be 2000$ max.
Posted by pg27uq owner
 - October 16, 2020, 19:32:01
Lower cost but higher price and higher provided value. Don't expect manufacturer to decide price based on cost. Its the best monitor until OLED GSYNC HDR1000 (+) will be annouced.
Posted by Anonyneko
 - October 16, 2020, 14:35:15
And here I thought Mini-LED was supposed to be a cheaper alternative to OLED...
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 16, 2020, 13:20:10
ASUS has packed an awful lot of features into the slim chassis of the ROG Swift PG32UQX, its 32-inch gaming monitor. Not only has ASUS included a 4K panel, but it also has equipped the PG32UQX with a 1,152 zone Mini-LED backlight and a 144 Hz refresh rate. The PG32UQX supports NVIDIA G-Sync Ultimate too, although there is no HDMI 2.1 on board.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/ASUS-ROG-Swift-PG32UQX-Retailer-listing-points-to-a-US-6-400-asking-price-for-4K-144-Hz-and-Mini-LED-gaming-monitor.498164.0.html