Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by S.Yu

- August 10, 2020, 00:35:49

I find it hard to believe that it's improved 30-40% without a rename unless they just took the low hanging fruits of fixing the scheduler and/or cooling solution, in which case the SoC probably consumes a good deal more power under load too. No longer interested in Samsungs but I guess I'm still a little curious about the outcome of the review.

Posted by JoeBlack

- August 09, 2020, 12:28:38

More likely on par with Snapdragon 855 (non-plus) when it comes to sustaned performance and real GPU power (not just 3D mark and other benchmarks that do not represent real case).

Posted by Redaktion

- August 08, 2020, 23:05:40

Many Samsung fans may have been disappointed to learn that the latest in the Galaxy Note lines were getting Exynos-powered SKUs in some markets via pre-launch leaks. However, other reports claimed that this processor – the 990 – had been updated so as to improve performance in these newer devices compared to the Galaxy S20 series with which they share the chipset.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Early-reviews-suggest-the-Galaxy-Note-20-series-does-indeed-have-an-improved-Exynos-990-SoC.484818.0.html