Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Ninja

- August 12, 2020, 22:33:01

To the written : You have a mistake in your article : 'OPN "100-000000061-06_ 49/37 _Y" indicates a boost speed up to 4.9 GHz and a base clock of 3.9 GHz." It should be 3.7GHz if we look at the OPN number.
In hope it help :)

Posted by Joel

- August 07, 2020, 21:50:00

Totally in favor of skipping the 4000 series for desktop CPUs. It's always been weird to me that the 4000U and 4000H are the same cores as the 3000 desktop. Getting the 5000 series desktop CPUs and the 5000 series laptop CPUs that are truly the same generation is what AMD ought to do.

Posted by Spunjji

- August 07, 2020, 18:03:34

Quote from: newUser2020aug7 on August 07, 2020, 16:58:18
Any chance these will have DDR5 and USB4 support?

None whatsoever - we'll get those with Zen 4.

Posted by newUser2020aug7

- August 07, 2020, 16:58:18

Any chance these will have DDR5 and USB4 support?

Posted by Redaktion

- August 07, 2020, 14:22:09

Igor's Lab has revealed a new OPN ID indicating a 3.5 GHz base clock and 4.8 GHz boost clock for a 16-core 32-thread Zen 3 Vermeer engineering sample. This is a 100 MHz higher boost than the current Ryzen 9 3950X, and AMD may be able to manage speeds closer to the 5 GHz mark in the retail units. It is also being rumored that AMD may change the branding to Ryzen 5000 to avoid confusion with existing Ryzen 4000 Renoir APUs for mobile and desktop.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-4950X-5950X-16C-32T-Zen-3-Vermeer-s-boost-clock-may-touch-the-5-GHz-mark-AMD-could-skip-4000-series-naming-for-desktop.483975.0.html