Seems unfair.

Huawei can do as they please but it's the consumer's duty to carry out due diligence and find out what's in the product for themselves rather than second guessing policies behind a product. Daft.

Quote from: 8&8 on July 07, 2020, 23:29:08
@tov i want to return in 2G :)

But 3GX can run up to 44Mbps

4G (hypothetically can go up to 100Mbps) but in reality go at max 40Mbps..
5G is useless specially for long range.

There's no such "hypothetical" limit. 4G has been tested to go over 1Gbps in real world conditions. Certainly not real world settings but that's up to the carriers how much they want to throttle individual devices to maintain reserve capacity for all devices in range, and maintain profits of course.

For now they remove Chinese products soon they probably remove Chinese peoples too

@tov i want to return in 2G :)

But 3GX can run up to 44Mbps

4G (hypothetically can go up to 100Mbps) but in reality go at max 40Mbps..
5G is useless specially for long range. 

"untrusted technology that could make the risk impossible to control" or similar phrasing was present in every single annual assessment of the Huawei deployment in the UK, they never said Huawei was safe(a few carrier executives said Huawei was safe, not the government). It's just that they had to deal with the lack of security while they secured the financial means to phase it out. Kudos to the UK for saying no in their financial situation, using non-Huawei 5G would mean isolating Huawei's segments in their 4G network because the hardware is incompatible between brands, unless they're emboldened by Open RAN? China's violation of the HK Joint Declaration probably played a part too.

Quote from: Tov on July 07, 2020, 08:49:03
Are they going back to 4G?

Ericsson and Nokia aren't more expensive than Huawei, the main reason Huawei could underbid is that China's policy banks hand out interest-free loans to go with every Huawei contract. In China carriers are more well off, so Huawei and ZTE don't even bother to underbid and still win >80% of the market because China's carriers are state-controlled and the Party orders them to buy Huawei and ZTE, leaving a symbolic slice of the market for international "competition" to pretend that they're running a market economy.

The reasoning is astonishing: Huawei equipment is safe, but the U.S. is making it unsafe now.  ::)

Are they going back to 4G?