News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Jay1
 - July 03, 2020, 05:47:02
Google the test.  It was faked.  The idiots who faked it fessed up.
Posted by LOL
 - June 30, 2020, 12:44:40
More competition is always good: Intel vs AMD, nVidia vs AMD.

Better performance, lower price.

No need to be tribal about it, just buy what you need and what you can afford.
Posted by CharTee
 - June 30, 2020, 10:19:04
You fail to mention that an i5 10400 will be out-performed by a Ryzen 5 3600, if paired with any other than a Z490 motherboard. Memory speeds are limited to 2666.... Nobody would be foolish enough to buy a Z490 motherboard (at least £140) and pair it with a locked down CPU like the i5-10400. So, by logic, if a 3600 beats a 10400, then a 3600XT will also beat it... That said, the 3600 will still be the far better buy.
Posted by Redaktion
 - June 30, 2020, 07:55:22
Leaked benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT indicate that AMD might have overplayed its hand with its Zen 2 refresh: The US$249 3600XT is bested in gaming benchmarks by Intel's cheaper Comet Lake S i5-10400.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Did-AMD-overplay-its-hand-with-XT-The-cheaper-Comet-Lake-S-i5-10400-bests-the-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600XT-in-leaked-gaming-benchmarks.478441.0.html