Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Alpha 2-4

- June 28, 2020, 16:03:48

Gaming Laptop manufacturers with time are showing less and less concern for their laptop panels whereas they are trying to assemble high end parts at low prices(which are still high), so rather I myself would prefer a laptop with a better screen than blazing-fast performance.....

Posted by Not suprising

- June 28, 2020, 15:51:29

Seems like 120 hz is the new 768p/1080p. Mostly garbage panels. Just like if you wanted decent brightness / color accuracy / gamut / contrast / etc - you needed to go for a higher res panel (2.5k / 3k / 4k). If you want response times comparable to desktop, need to go for 240 / 300 hz panels.

Posted by Muhammad Anhar

- June 28, 2020, 08:46:01

Asus G14 has better things beside the response time. Also in this price with Intel processor, Acer shouldn't use low color gamut and high response time display.

Posted by DeepskyScorpion

- June 28, 2020, 07:49:58

Yet you do not mention it when G14 does worse and at a similar price point, and run sponsored oosts for asus?

Posted by Redaktion

- June 28, 2020, 05:55:05

Acer's 17.3-inch gaming laptop brings all the latest computer games smoothly onto the screen. The configuration is pleasing: A Comet Lake hexa-core processor, a GeForce RTX 2060 GPU, a 1 TB NVMe SSD and 16 GB of RAM (dual-channel) are on board.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-120-Hz-display-of-the-Nitro-5-only-delivers-poor-response-times-The-Acer-Nitro-5-AN517-52-in-review.477402.0.html