Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Anonymous

- April 24, 2020, 22:17:16

Quote from: william blake the second on April 23, 2020, 19:59:46
im so happy amd is stepping up their integrated graphics. i use them all the time when i play minecraft but i wanna use raytracing :(

You know, I use AMD's iGPU, and it pulled admirably in 2011 games (I'm talking about AAA games like Crysis 2 at that time). Full HD, high to very high, above 40 FPS.

Wait for RDNA2 APUs if you want to play games with RT.

Posted by william blake the second

- April 23, 2020, 19:59:46

im so happy amd is stepping up their integrated graphics. i use them all the time when i play minecraft but i wanna use raytracing :(

Posted by william blake

- April 23, 2020, 19:06:03

see? nobody cares about integrated graphics :)

Posted by Redaktion

- April 23, 2020, 16:14:56

The CPU and GPU clocks appear to be quite low compared to mobility models like the Ryzen 7 4700U, but the "Artic" chip proves to be faster, at least in CPU-related tests, and the DDR4-3200 support certainly helped. On the iGPU side, however, the performance is not that great, as it turned out to be slower than a Vega 6 model.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Artic-Ryzen-4000-desktop-APU-spotted-on-3DMark.462301.0.html