Why you all compare with AMD lower version product if you are compare with customers Banefit then AMD is always better than Intel

So intel compared 65 or 95 watt tdp processors with 125 watt tdp processors and this site so eager to deliver the good news..

I would still prefer ryzen chip because it comes with decent stock cooler

I don't believe anything till I see a complete benchmark from a reliable source. These tidbits of information only serve Intel. It almost feels like they're delaying the release.

Intel needs to deliver or begone.

Quote from: _MT_ on April 19, 2020, 18:46:21

Quote from: liljom on April 19, 2020, 16:55:35
English is not my mother tongue, and I looked up defy in the dictionary. I was like, how serious of a word it can be to describe 0,1% difference (28523 vs ca. 28500).
Feels like a paid article.
And why median for AMD?

I think it's a weird use of the word. A common expression is to defy gravity. You can defy laws. Authority. Children can be defiant. But to defy an opponent? What? It shouldn't be confused with defeat. I can only guess it's supposed to mean that the posted result challenges AMD (less probable since it doesn't really) or that they're resisting, keeping on fighting. However, as I wrote, it's weird.

I read it like that, in the sense that AMD dominates the market, thus "defyable". :)

Quote from: lalka on April 19, 2020, 10:42:56
The total superiority, completely annihilated in userbenchmark. Not a big surprise.

The total stupidity, completely idiotic comment. Not at all surprised.

Userbenchmark is such garbage. Their overall speed rankings have an i5-7600K beating an i7-6700K, and that is not even close to the worst examples. They should be called 'Oldgamesbenchmark'.

Quote from: liljom on April 19, 2020, 16:55:35
English is not my mother tongue, and I looked up defy in the dictionary. I was like, how serious of a word it can be to describe 0,1% difference (28523 vs ca. 28500).
Feels like a paid article.
And why median for AMD?

I think it's a weird use of the word. A common expression is to defy gravity. You can defy laws. Authority. Children can be defiant. But to defy an opponent? What? It shouldn't be confused with defeat. I can only guess it's supposed to mean that the posted result challenges AMD (less probable since it doesn't really) or that they're resisting, keeping on fighting. However, as I wrote, it's weird.

English is not my mother tongue, and I looked up defy in the dictionary. I was like, how serious of a word it can be to describe 0,1% difference (28523 vs ca. 28500).
Feels like a paid article.
And why median for AMD?

Userbenchmark trolls inbound. Hypernormalize stuff.

Another paid article, how can they said Intel is superior at the same benchmark result while AMD is cooler, useless power, cheaper and no need to change board.

I don't understand the comparison. Why not compare Intel i5 with AMD's equivalent in price and power usage? What does it matter if it's more or less cores/threads or if it's i5 vs Ryzen 5? What matters is what kind of single and multithread performance you can get out of a certain price and power usage.

The total superiority, completely annihilated in userbenchmark. Not a big surprise.