Quote from: jeremy on March 27, 2020, 16:54:31Agreed.Quote from: S.Yu on March 27, 2020, 15:30:21Seriously, the SPX should have been half the price. I don't care what delusions MSFT and Qualcomm have about the SPX being a top tier device, it's only worth $600 for a loaded model, at best. It should have been the next Surface Go (or priced in that range), not their range topping flagship. That's just delusional pricing.
It's hard to say if the digitizer interface would be properly supported, also I don't believe many swallow SP's horrid price-performance just for it to run Windows on ARM. How many of those SPX's did they really sell?
Quote from: S.Yu on March 27, 2020, 15:30:21Seriously, the SPX should have been half the price. I don't care what delusions MSFT and Qualcomm have about the SPX being a top tier device, it's only worth $600 for a loaded model, at best. It should have been the next Surface Go (or priced in that range), not their range topping flagship. That's just delusional pricing.
It's hard to say if the digitizer interface would be properly supported, also I don't believe many swallow SP's horrid price-performance just for it to run Windows on ARM. How many of those SPX's did they really sell?