Quote from: Spunjji on February 12, 2020, 16:01:32You are right, my bad. Should have added "allegedly" to the title and all would have been more clear. It won't happen again, I promise. :)Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 12, 2020, 12:50:08Quote from: _MT_ on February 12, 2020, 12:39:16You almost caught ME red-handed! However, if you paid attention a bit later in the article, the US _claims_ to have been caught the Chinese using the backdoor since 2009. If they have solid proof or not, that's another discussion.
So, at the beginning, you claim they have been caught red handed, they have been spying, but then the article says they have the ability? What's this? There is a big difference between having the ability and being caught doing it. Do you really have to treat us like we're idiots with those headlines?
That's not what *your* article says, though. It says the US claims to have evidence that the back door exists and *could* be used, not that they claim to have proof of it having been used. The title and opening paragraph directly imply that it *has been / is being used*, which is misleading in the context of the information you provide here.
Personally, while I have little doubt that Huawei would use such backdoors as and when suits them, I still find it very rich that the US government are crying wolf over this when we know full well that they engage in the exact same behaviour. The FBI even attempted a smear campaign against Apple for refusing to create security holes in their devices.
Quote from: drspychology on February 12, 2020, 13:07:16No government is entirely trustworthy, so we can only assume that they are telling the truth... or not.
Why is there a backdoor in the first place? I doubt that the american government has been more careful with the data than Huawei. This always feels like the pot calling the kettle black: Huawei gets banned for "allegedly" going through people's data, while the US government and US companies have been proven to use and sell personal data, yet they don't get punished? Also, I don't know how trustworthy data from a China-hating government is on this.
Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 12, 2020, 12:50:08Quote from: _MT_ on February 12, 2020, 12:39:16You almost caught ME red-handed! However, if you paid attention a bit later in the article, the US _claims_ to have been caught the Chinese using the backdoor since 2009. If they have solid proof or not, that's another discussion.
So, at the beginning, you claim they have been caught red handed, they have been spying, but then the article says they have the ability? What's this? There is a big difference between having the ability and being caught doing it. Do you really have to treat us like we're idiots with those headlines?
Quote from: Stephen Lindsey on February 12, 2020, 10:55:58Somehow your comment has been totally ignored. I'm guessing that it's too uncomfortable to answer to that without showing double standards.
The Times this morning has a front page article about a CIA operation fronted by a swiss equipment manufacturer that spied on 120 countries for years. Can we please have a notebookchat erticle on this
Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 12, 2020, 12:56:00Quote from: Anonymous on February 12, 2020, 12:46:13It's not just the US government, unfortunately. Huawei isn't that clean, either.
Why is the writer of this article assuming that it is now confirmed Huawei has been spying, when this is just another political news coming from US-based media representing the voice of the US government? As a tech journalist, you could've used wordings like 'reportedly' or 'The Wall Street Journal says' especially for a highly sensitive topic like this.
Quote from: _MT_ on February 12, 2020, 12:39:16I would like to add that this is actually an important condition. The NSA has no interest in making US systems vulnerable to foreign attack. They're interested in holes where they're confident they're the only ones who can use them. Ideally, there is also a plausible deniability component, meaning it can't be proven it was intentional and can be passed off as a bug/ mistake if discovered.
If you're thinking of the same incident, I believe the beauty of that hole was that only the creator knew whether it really existed. The committee determined it was suspicious when it was submitted, that there is a way to craft the values such that you have a backdoor, but I believe it would be mathematically hard to find the backdoor. Only the author had it.
Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 12, 2020, 12:50:08It's unclear whether that means they noticed a backdoor or caught Huawei using it. I still think the headline and lead paragraph are inflated and sensationalist. I know it's the tone of this day and age, but I don't like it. I know facts might seem sometimes boring, but I like to see what I'm getting. If US government claims Huawei spied, then say US government claims Huawei spied. And not Huawei spied.
You almost caught ME red-handed! However, if you paid attention a bit later in the article, the US _claims_ to have been caught the Chinese using the backdoor since 2009. If they have solid proof or not, that's another discussion.
Quote from: Anonymous on February 12, 2020, 12:46:13It's not just the US government, unfortunately. Huawei isn't that clean, either.
Why is the writer of this article assuming that it is now confirmed Huawei has been spying, when this is just another political news coming from US-based media representing the voice of the US government? As a tech journalist, you could've used wordings like 'reportedly' or 'The Wall Street Journal says' especially for a highly sensitive topic like this.
Quote from: _MT_ on February 12, 2020, 12:39:16You almost caught ME red-handed! However, if you paid attention a bit later in the article, the US _claims_ to have been caught the Chinese using the backdoor since 2009. If they have solid proof or not, that's another discussion.
So, at the beginning, you claim they have been caught red handed, they have been spying, but then the article says they have the ability? What's this? There is a big difference between having the ability and being caught doing it. Do you really have to treat us like we're idiots with those headlines?