Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by S.Yu

- November 28, 2019, 18:37:03

Quote from: Redaktion on November 27, 2019, 20:57:17
Amid the noise of Galaxy S11 series renders and disagreeing leakers, a few listings of the processor expected to power Samsung's next flagships have appeared on Geekbench. While some have reported that they look unusually low, the comparisons with other flagship SoCs do not bode well for Samsung.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Early-Geekbench-listings-give-us-a-look-at-the-Exynos-9830-and-it-makes-for-grim-reading.444712.0.html

Unlikely to be final, or near final results. This is IIRC slightly lower than 9820 right? Relative to the 855+, I mean. ARM's cores show notable improvement, and it should be on a better process, so unless the IO and memory are total failures...or the scheduler isn't ready, this shouldn't be happening.

Posted by fdasdasdas

- November 28, 2019, 09:48:46

Okey dokey, so the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 is better than the next Galaxy S11 flagship SoC. Niiiice.

Posted by Redaktion

- November 27, 2019, 20:57:17

Amid the noise of Galaxy S11 series renders and disagreeing leakers, a few listings of the processor expected to power Samsung's next flagships have appeared on Geekbench. While some have reported that they look unusually low, the comparisons with other flagship SoCs do not bode well for Samsung.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Early-Geekbench-listings-give-us-a-look-at-the-Exynos-9830-and-it-makes-for-grim-reading.444712.0.html