Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Rei Fukai

- November 21, 2019, 14:28:03

Quote from: LK on November 21, 2019, 06:04:00
Others are saying this shows a 9-10% increase in IPC over Ice Lake, which would mean a ~25-30% increase over Skylake. If this is true, it would appear to be much closer to a "roar" to me.

Skylake is a four year old architecture, which is pretty outdated by now. Skylake it's performance tanked when Spectre and Meltdown became public knowledge. AMD has almost had a 10% YOY IPC increase, and the intel chips use almost twice the power for twice as less core's (9900KS vs 3950x powerconsumption )

Posted by toven

- November 21, 2019, 11:49:25

Apple 5nm A14 vs A9 sound like an earthquake for me then.

Posted by LK

- November 21, 2019, 06:04:00

Others are saying this shows a 9-10% increase in IPC over Ice Lake, which would mean a ~25-30% increase over Skylake. If this is true, it would appear to be much closer to a "roar" to me.

Posted by Redaktion

- November 21, 2019, 05:23:02

A Tiger Lake Y processor has seemingly been spotted on Geekbench delivering some very unimpressive results. However, it's likely that if the record is genuine then Intel may be simply testing an early engineering sample (ES) that's not operating at its regular base clock rate. Tiger Lake is expected to be the successor to Intel's Ice Lake microarchitecture.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alleged-Tiger-Lake-Y-chip-makes-more-of-a-purr-than-a-roar-in-Geekbench-test.443712.0.html