Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Sam Medley

- November 06, 2019, 16:24:12

Review author here.
Yes, the AdoboeRGB coverage should be 35%. sRGB is 54%. Thanks for catching that.
The screen is disappointingly dim. Usable indoors and away from windows; otherwise, you're gonna have a bad time.
The configuration tested was the Tecra X50-F (Core i7-8665U, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB NVMe SSD, FHS Touchscreen).

Posted by Mathi

- November 05, 2019, 22:17:22

Which exact configuration (model no.) did you test?
The newer Tecra X30/40/50-F screens are advertised to have a brightness of 470 nits, so the measured values are quite disappointing.

Posted by A

- November 05, 2019, 21:25:18

@Puppy - 54% sRGB, that is Adobe.

But yeah, Toshiba has always had a bad habit of finding the worst screen on the market to put into their top end laptops.

Posted by Puppy

- November 05, 2019, 20:11:43

35% sRGB only? It must be a mistake.

Posted by Redaktion

- November 05, 2019, 18:53:43

The Tecra is back under a new name. The Dynabook Tecra X50 retains much of the Tecra flair for thinness but ultimately falls flat. While the X50 is a competent machine overall, it is priced far too high for what it offers.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dynabook-Tecra-X50-Laptop-Review-A-light-Ultrabook-with-light-endurance.440691.0.html