Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Alex Alderson

- August 20, 2019, 11:56:13

Quote from: Imglidinhere on August 03, 2019, 06:35:39
Right and consider that Userbench also lists an i3-8350k as 3% faster than the Ryzen 7 2700X because it has an idiotic weighted scoring system:

40% single core
58% quad core
2% multi core (more than quad)

Interesting how that caters more to the lower-thread Intel chips. Factor that in first before posting these articles please.

I have not factored in the overall weighting because of the issues you described. Instead, I have just based comparisons on individual single, quad and multi core scores.

Posted by Imglidinhere

- August 03, 2019, 06:35:39

Right and consider that Userbench also lists an i3-8350k as 3% faster than the Ryzen 7 2700X because it has an idiotic weighted scoring system:

40% single core
58% quad core
2% multi core (more than quad)

Interesting how that caters more to the lower-thread Intel chips. Factor that in first before posting these articles please.

Posted by Redaktion

- August 01, 2019, 11:39:55

A Tiger Lake Y series processor has appeared on UserBenchmark with some incredible benchmark results. The Ice Lake successor is 25% faster than the Ryzen 7 3750H in single and multi-core tasks while being 11% faster than the Core i7-8750H too. Core i9-8950HK level single-core performance from a 5 W chip? Colour us impressed, if not slightly sceptical.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Tiger-Lake-Y-processor-posts-absurd-UserBenchmark-scores-Core-i9-8950HK-single-core-performance-on-a-5-W-chip.428410.0.html