Quote from: Concatenate on June 03, 2019, 23:28:37Well I sort of saw it the other way, they lack notebook options because their designs lack the efficiency to be competitive in that power envelope, but I don't have a strong opinion on this, we'll have to wait and see.
@S.Yu
Desktop cards were indeed not known for being efficient. Though its partly due to AMD pushing desktop parts above the frequency curve the arch was most efficient at (which is between 800-900Mhz ) Another trick they have is Vulkan/DX12 becoming more mainstream among developers. Old Adreno graphics are still running revisions of openGLES. New ones have vulkan support but AMD still has the advantage of already supporting vulkan since the first GCN arch. They also have smaller benefits like supporting FP16 already.
AMD producing mobile graphics is not nearly as hopeless as Intel trying to compete with ARM cpu's