Quote from: Andreas Osthoff on January 17, 2019, 14:48:46
@Dantoine:
Our performance rating is automatically calculated by the benchmark results. However, we also have a look at the sustained performance and deduct points in the magnitude of the deficit. For example: The i5 performance drops by ~15%, so we deduct 15%. This is to ensure that an i7 with a higher initial result (but lower score under sustained workload) does not get a better rating than an i5 with a higher performance under stress, like in this case.
Yes, this is obviously an Intel issue, but Lenovo should have noticed it, too, and they should have set a fixed limit to avoid this behavior. Other manufacturers and other devices from Lenovo do this as well.
Quote from: DavidEngineer on January 17, 2019, 13:36:02
I purchased this Tablet from Lenovo about 2 months ago as a replacement for a Surface Pro. I wanted a larger display. I got the i7 sku and 16gb of ram. After two days I had to return it. The machine overheated significantly, making it nearly unusable. I was worried about the longevity of the machine because I've never used a laptop that got that hot under my typical workload. I assumed it was defective unit. It appears it is a heat management design issue, or an Intel problem. I purchased a Surface Laptop 2 as a replacement. Microsoft's heat management for their i7 sku appears to be much better. The machine runs cool and performs well for me under load. I also own a Huawei Matebook X Pro i7 for home use. It's heat management for the i7 sku is somewhere between Lenovo and Microsoft. It gets much warmer under old and doesn't appear to be as fast. I believe this website indicates the Huawei Matebook X Pro i7 is no faster than the i5 and I believe that based on my experience.
Quote from: heffeque on January 16, 2019, 18:44:44
What a mess. I've seen this on other brands too (where i5-U is faster than i7-U). Don't brands test their equipment to optimize their performance before selling them? It just looks like they just slap parts together and hope for the best, which doesn't seem like top engineering to me. Hopefully Lenovo (and other brands) learn from this and start to take things seriously.
Quote from: james A Tomlinson on January 19, 2019, 01:09:47
My Desktop benchmark on "userbenchmark dot com" went from 69% to 88% with that setting change.
QuoteLenovo should have noticed it, too, and they should have set a fixed limit to avoid this behavior