Quote from: jeremy on December 11, 2018, 00:14:23
Find me the Ryzen APU mobile drivers from AMD. Find them. I've already scoured their site. AMD Ryzen mobile drivers simply aren't available from AMD's website.
Don't be an apologist for AMD. Demand better from the Texas based company. It's not a cult and it's not a religion. You can question them and demand more from them.
AMD dropping the ball on mobile drivers is unacceptable, especially since they used to provide direct support for their 10h/Bulldozer based mobile APUs.
There are no Radeon drivers for Notebooks with Raven Ridge APUs directly from AMD. All other chips are not affected (including older APUs). This is a "known" issue and recently AMD promised to push their partners to release regular updates.
Until now Acer, HP and Lenovo seemed to not care about providing up-to-date drivers, while others do (at least Huawei released a new Radeon driver for their Matebook/Magicbook a few days ago).
It should be noted that notebooks with Intel CPUs share the same troubles. The only difference is that Intel allows the download of driver files that can be used to manually update the iGPU drivers from Device Manager (at own risk).
Back to Topic: Interesting that the author leaves out the fact, that there is another option of the Acer Nitro 5 with 2500U that is much cheaper (and not really slower). This model is priced on line with Notebooks that are equipped with MX150 GPUs at best.
QuoteThe problems with the aforementioned laptops are classic AMD. The Radeon RX 560X in the Nitro 5, for example, is comparable to the GeForce GTX 1050 in 3DMark benchmarks but real-world gaming performance is about 15 percent slower.
Compared to what ? Notebooks with 45W TDP CPUs that naturally perform better due to higher CPU clocks, but with (usually) lesser battery runtime and more heat ? There are actually Notebooks with 1050 (non Max-Q) that perform worse than the Acer Nitro in Witcher 3 (Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T or MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL).
QuoteFurthermore, we encountered a handful of crashes, errors, stutters, and other driver-related issues when trying out different games. The gaming experience continues to be smoother and much less of a headache on Intel and Nvidia hardware.
Are they ? Then why is every Nvidia driver release thread on the notebookreview forum full of reports and issues (f.e. the ever broken G-Sync notebook support), while those do never occur on a review here on NBC ?
Or let's take the famous error 43 with Geforce driver 397.31, that rendered all 1060s (including mobile) useless until a hotfix was available. That isn't called a "glitch" ?