News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Tomm
 - December 08, 2018, 14:28:53
"marginally faster", is not twice as good.
Posted by Ricci Rox
 - December 07, 2018, 15:14:16
Quote from: fasddsadasdas on December 07, 2018, 14:16:39
It it not like it is twice as good as the Exynos 9820. MAN, notebookcheck has become a clickbait site and I HATE it.

I'm not sure where you saw the claim that the 855 was twice as good in the title?
Posted by fasddsadasdas
 - December 07, 2018, 14:16:39
It it not like it is twice as good as the Exynos 9820. MAN, notebookcheck has become a clickbait site and I HATE it.
Posted by Redaktion
 - December 07, 2018, 10:45:54
The Exynos-powered models from previous Galaxy S models appeared to be slightly faster than the Snapdragon versions, but it looks like the situation is now reversed for the upcoming Galaxy S10 handhelds. Early samples of the Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 855 tested in AnTuTu show a slight advantage for Qualcomm's chip, but the final versions might provide different results.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Snapdragon-855-beats-Samsung-s-Exynos-9820-in-latest-AnTuTu-benchmarks.374621.0.html