News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Johnny Doe
 - December 02, 2018, 21:07:02
They wont switch completely from GF, because of the WSA. Also for ROME I/O tile might be printed at GF 14nm and the rest cores/chiplets at TSMC and glued there. Also 2% for little over 12m is not bad, but not good either. Pls note 10nm Intel is coming, and AMD needs to pay the market price for the wafers contrary to using GF.
Posted by asdf34534512
 - December 02, 2018, 20:13:29
Quote from: God on December 02, 2018, 17:35:51
Bull s***. Amd is garbage.
If Amd is garbage then what is Intel now? Dog poo?
Posted by Daniel Valencia
 - December 02, 2018, 18:58:07
Spoken like a true fanatic.
Posted by God
 - December 02, 2018, 17:35:51
Bull s***. Amd is garbage.
Posted by Redaktion
 - December 02, 2018, 14:57:31
The EPYC CPU line, based on AMD's Zen 2 platform, was released recently in order to compete with Intel's x86-based processors for server-grade applications. DRAMeXchange has reported that the new alternative has already managed to reduce Intel's market share by 2%. This may not sound impressive, but it is also significantly better compared to the 0% they commanded prior to the release of EPYC Naples.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-s-EPYC-CPUs-have-already-snatched-server-market-share-away-from-Intel.373621.0.html