Quote from: fasddsadasdas on October 29, 2018, 11:56:55
What a misleading article,  LOL.
What about the shitty screen with 720P resolution on the iphone? I think that is a MUCH bigger problem than the 25% worse performance of the top Android devices. 720P+ on a 6.1 inch phone looks like a Nokia 3110. Don't care about the soc if the image is as good as a CRT TV from 2000.

Your post is more misleading, iPhones have had subpixel rendering since...as long as I can remember, they most certainly look sharper than the pixel density suggests and will look nothing like that Nokia.

What a misleading article,  LOL.
What about the shitty screen with 720P resolution on the iphone? I think that is a MUCH bigger problem than the 25% worse performance of the top Android devices. 720P+ on a 6.1 inch phone looks like a Nokia 3110. Don't care about the soc if the image is as good as a CRT TV from 2000.

"While benchmarks give us a good idea of how fast a phone can be under optimal conditions"
Quite an ignorant remark. See Anandtech's run of Spec2006, which shows a much larger single core advantage of the A12. Geekbench is bottlenecked elsewhere and can't accurately reflect the performance gap between top modern SoCs (CPUs, specifically).

Oh wow Apple great job with that hideous dongled monstrosity. Now I can make phone calls and text 25% faster and  I can be even more productive when I lay around naked all day taking selfies and pretending I'm actually doing something important or relevant!