Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Bob Loblaw

- May 11, 2018, 14:57:24

Like most phones, I've waited until it is about 8+ months old and have then gone out and bought it when on sale. Picked up one of these for about 160 EUR if google conversion is right, which makes me wonder WTF were they thinking listing this at ~350 EUR.

Short of it is, I think it is worth it at this price. I know SD435 isn't a workhorse cpu, but if you only do basic browsing, youtube etc. this is perfect.

ps. thank you to Notebookcheck.net. Your site is a brilliant resource, and these mobile reviews are a credit to you and your team.

Posted by Cyril Taylor

- August 25, 2017, 10:46:54

It is a very decent phone. But it is not for everyone. It suits light/moderate users who are looking for a well-built and good looking device. The spec hungry buyers can look elsewhere.

@Anon - This phone is certainly not junk. I paid $175 and it is well worth it.

Posted by Anon

- August 24, 2017, 05:09:32

Ugh, LG likes to make junk.
It's not like the price of SD625/630 will increase the BOM for $100. Good luck with the unsold stock, LG.
First the LG G5 then this, I'd love to see your income statement later

Posted by Redaktion

- August 23, 2017, 21:16:30

Trimmed. The looks of the LG Q6 closely resemble those of the LG G6, only at a much lower price point. The trade-off is its trimmed performance. A performance, which makes the phone struggle hard in its price range. We will find out whether the phone is a recommendable purchase.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/LG-Q6-Smartphone-Review.244178.0.html