Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Kyu

- November 25, 2017, 20:00:56

Seriously, nobody try to ask himself " how is that possible that an iphone scores 2x a Snapdragon 835 only at Geekbench ?".

Apple optimised his phone to have high score at this test, that's all, and it's called "cheating".

Only a few reviewers and youtubers have mentioned this scam, why ?

Posted by JD2

- November 20, 2017, 10:50:04

Very well said Yuri. I was going to write the same but you explained it very well.

Posted by Yuri

- November 20, 2017, 04:10:50

How have you guys not realized geekbench is a bad benchmark, especially for comparing different platforms? Compare the iPhone chipset to some of Intel's desktop processors and ask yourself why, according to geekbench, the mobile chip seems more powerful.

Posted by Thesis

- November 19, 2017, 23:18:43

iPhone's new chip has more cache and silicon, which means it can be faster. Qualcomm must be waiting until they move to 7nm to do that. Same with Samsung's own home brewed chip.

Posted by asherpat

- November 19, 2017, 20:15:08

Thank God! Oof, I cudn't sleep thinking that Apple may not be the best in everything.

Posted by Redaktion

- November 19, 2017, 08:21:36

Benchmarks of a purported Samsung Galaxy S9 model have surfaced on Geekbench. While the scores show it to be one of the fastest Android flagships, it still is miles behind the iPhone X.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Purported-Galaxy-S9-benchmark-scores-are-no-match-for-the-iPhone-X.264130.0.html