You really need to sort out your scoring scale how can such a flawed device deserve a score in the 70s, surely 50% is mediocre and anything above is better that...? Even many laptops in the 80 percent range hardly have glowing reviews from yourselves. I think your weighting must be way off, while it seems scientific, it just doesn't work out that way, maybe it's to make sure you keep getting review machines, or maybe it's so readers will do more than judge from the score at the top, but either way it doesn't seem right...