Does anybody still benchmark this game? Or rather how can I contribute to this game benchmark?

alguien que me diga a que correra un portatil ACER core I5  6 gb ram, con una tarjeta nvidia de 940 gt. si medio , alto , o maximo. le agradezco :)

I do not know how accurate are those benchmarks but I get 45-60 fps on medium settings.. : core i5-3210m + Radeon HD 7670m Rebrand(OC 25%) + 8GB RAM: cpu-83'C/gpu 67'C.. runs fluently, no probs

I have a XMG A522 with the 660m, so my question is what temparature did you get playing WoT on the GPU / CPU?
Without even started the battle (v9.0) just staying in the garage turning the view, temp goes up to 76 degree celsius. the fan-control starts to switch to full speed (in an sawtooth on/off style which drives me crazy).

Happy to here from your temps / fan experiences.
Peter
(=PA=)

I get 25-45 fps with my 8350 and 7970... WoT is stupidly single-cored....

WOT 8.4 added support for NVidia SLI. Could we perhaps rerun some of these benchmarks. Note be careful on driver versions. There are still some hickups for SLI.

remember that WOT is not optimized for multiple cores, and with quad cores having a slower clock speed than dual cores they will face a larger bottleneck than others, its not the graphics cards at fault. Wargaming just hasn't invested in a multi core engine, and thus the processor is the bottleneck for MOST mobile systems. :p

Even with the newest nvidia-driver i get only 30 fps in maximum settings. We will probably order a fresh gtx 680m.

My System:
Clevo P370EM , i7-3820QM, 680M, 8GB 1600mhz Corsair, 1tb Seagate Momentus HDD 5400U/min
Nvidia Driverversion: 306.97

Fraps won't recognize Wot, so you just have to belive me.
FPS are allways between min. 50 and max 60. According to the displayed Framrate of Wot its the most time around 57-59 FPS.




Update:
Fraps Update:
Frames 9830
Time (ms) 180000
Min 39
Max 62
Avg 54.611

We are talking about ONE game out of thousands. So i wouldn´t take the problem too seriously. By the way: One of our users will test our replay with his gtx 680m notebook. Just wait for the results.

Both Wargaming.net and Nvidia should be warned about the 680M performance failure vs the 7970M to identify whether an update could occur from either the driver or from WOT to rectify this difference. The performance of the 680M is completely out of line for WOT. Users who purchase an Alienware for WOT customization(the flashing lights) should be aware of the major difference in their choices. What is surprising is the fact that Wargaming.net gamers in Russia use Alienware heavily and didn't notice this difference in the 680M vs 7970M? ...or did they ? Its an astonishing difference. Folks getting the latest video card from Nvidia are expecting to have the best performance on wot and not be blown away from an older nvidia 675M or by the 7970M. Did the new 8.0 rendering nerf the 680M? Or was performance vs the 7970M always that bad relatively. Not only should be looking at explaining the difference between the 680M and AMD but also between the 680M and its predecessors. Degrading performance with newer top of line cards is not cool to see at all.

I tested both GPUs (HD 7970M & GTX 680M) twice - same results. I even used a different HDD and GPU-driver. And yes, especially the FHD-result is kind of strange.

What the heck happened to your 680M tests. Based on your review : http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-GeForce-GTX-680M-vs-Radeon-HD-7970M.77110.0.html the results of the 680M vs 675M vs 7970M for WOT make no sense AT ALL.