Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Phil888

- December 19, 2014, 23:13:22

What if I don't like Mac OS? than what do I buy? Mac OS does not do all what I want, than what?

Posted by Certi

- November 09, 2014, 09:30:25

Hello, any chance that someone post a pic with difference of 1366x768 and 1920x1080..? Or to send me by mail, just want to see how big difference it is... thanks!

Posted by Den kappekledde hevner

- August 03, 2014, 22:28:38

X240 has a significantly weaker CPU compared to 13" MacBook Pro Retina (15W vs 28W). X240 also has significantly weaker graphics (4600 vs 5100). Apple has a higher resale value. Apple's trackpad is vastly superior, and their keyboards are as good as Lenovo's. Most people hunt-and-peck type and will learn to hate Lenovo's pointing stick. You'll hit it again and again if you aren't touch typing.

Posted by navyn

- July 20, 2014, 11:19:57

Buying a macbook pro 13 retina, better 16:10 screen ratio and keyboard

Posted by FixItPls

- June 30, 2014, 10:39:52

No dedicated mouse buttons :(
No activity LEDs :(
sRGB 57% (+ reported image retention problems) :(
COST € :(

Posted by adrian

- June 09, 2014, 13:36:01

well,lenovo made it, i bought a mac instead of another thinkpad.Thanks for destroying the thinkpad brand

Posted by Redaktion

- June 06, 2014, 10:10:11

More pixels. After the WXGA version of the ThinkPad X240 could already show its qualities in our review, we now have a look at the high-end version with a Full HD display. But are the additional pixels really worth the premium price?

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-X240-Full-HD-Notebook-Review.118125.0.html