News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning - while you were reading 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by DantePierttyr
 - Today at 12:01:57
Power Consumption varies greatly depending on the laptop and thermal management implemented.

AMD will win most of the time if we level both below 30w, the 890M is the superior solution with better driver support.
Posted by Hotz
 - Today at 11:37:53
Because:

1) the graph shows that Intel Arc 140T (70W) requires more power than the AMD Radeon 890m (50W)

2) the text says that "power consumption as a Radeon 890M laptop would demand almost 45 percent more power than an Arc 140T laptop"


-> Thus the article contradicts itself

Posted by chris@amd
 - Today at 10:15:21
49.2W for S16 890m in cyberpunk vs 68.8W for msi with 140T, what's wrong with author's inference of the power graph ?!
Posted by Istvan
 - Today at 08:27:33
The power graph shows the exact opposite of what the article text says, with the AMD system using 50W vs the Intel one using 70W.

Which one is correct ?
Posted by Redaktion
 - Today at 02:39:22
Our first benchmarks are in for Intel's Arrow Lake Arc 140T iGPU and they don't look too bad against the competing Radeon 890M depending on your point of view.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Arc-140T-vs-Radeon-890M-benchmarks-Both-a-win-and-a-lose-for-Intel.979421.0.html