I don't see why the author's getting so excited about 1.3 kg, as it's only about 100 GRAM lighter than most high-end 14 inch convertibles. As to the port selection, yeah, it sucks, I'm looking at 8 year old lenovo 14 inch convertible: 2 x usb-c, 2 x usb-A. And a hdmi. And a micro-sd (not that lenovo laptops are great, they've been on a steady decline since mid-2010s).
It's not light enough and doesn't have enough ports. I don't see why other laptop manufactures aren't following Fujitsu's example with a 700g non touch laptop or a 900g touch convertible while having 4 USB, HDMI, and lan ports. Although they use half the typical battery capacity to achieve most of the weight savings, the higher efficiency CPUs use less power.
I don't get it, this processor is "efficient" but it has lower perf scores and lower wifi runtime on similar battery when compared to hp 1040 g11 with meteor lake. Is it just the OLED. The lack of HDMI is the biggest deal-breaker. Why do they have to imitate Apple so much:(
The OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 may be one of HP's lightest 14-inch convertibles, but it's far from being the slowest. Intel's new Lunar Lake CPU helps to strike a great balance between portability and performance.
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar