Post reply

Posted by skylight

- November 02, 2024, 03:53:15

The brightness changes in time by superposition of 1440Hz and lower frequencies. The lower frequencies are visible in some review videos as moving lines on the screen of a recent 1440Hz spec'ed Matebook or Matepad.

Posted by JoeTheW

- October 16, 2024, 17:24:57

Quote from: NikoB on June 06, 2024, 22:11:13I don't believe in PWM at 1440Hz for a typical AMOLED screen with a characteristic subpixel structure? If you actually increase the PWM to such a frequency, the panel will burn out in less than 5000 hours (which is 1-1.5 years of operation and that's it). Guaranteed.

I no longer trust NB's PWM tests and urge the editors to publish the usual "pencil test" on video instead. When changing brightness from 100% to 10%. And it will be immediately clear to everyone, without fiddling with the "oscilloscope," whether there is really visible flickering at low, operating brightness - refusal to post such a video in every review will only prove a fraud with test results.

Otherwise, a mediocre laptop with twice the price. A pitiful 32GB of slow (poorly efficient) RAM (apparently Huawei no longer has access to lpddr5 7500+ chips). Again, the moronic arrangement of 2xTB4, although Intel itself recommends placing them symmetrically on the left and right, but the morons in the development departments apparently think that they are smarter (no).
The lack of HDMI 2.1 and USB-a sharply reduces the comfort of use. As well as the lack of rj45 at 5gbps, in places where the only connection method is a cable network.

At the same time, the shameful Ultra 9 185H, even in PL2 mode, shamefully loses more than 2 times to the outdated 7840U in the AIDA64 Ray-Trace 64 test.

The noise will obviously be extremely unpleasant at the slightest load, because... The radiators here are for children, because... weight less than 1kg.

The result is a useless toy for strange adults who have extra easy money lying around in their pockets from somewhere. Why and for what purpose such a purchase is not clear.

My Man you know a Lot

Posted by jacktlh

- June 09, 2024, 07:57:37

Background:
I've used a range of laptops from old Alienware to recent Thinkpads, Legion, Macbook Air, Macbook Pro, etc...

Conclusion:
This is easily the best laptop I have ever owned. (2 BIOS updates). The price you paid for this laptop is still way lower than what you would have to pay for a Macbook Pro. You are paying for really good engineering and productive machine like Aplle.

I'm eagerly looking forward to seeing Huawei making a laptop with ARM CPU!

Pros:

Lighter than my Huawei MatePad, iPad with keyboard attached.
Screen is sharp, bright and accurate.
Rounded corner on the screen makes it asethically pleasant looking.
Keyboard suitable for typing, and backlight light up when you start typing. (Thinkpad, Lenovo come on)
Trackpad is easily the best on windows OS finally I can use a laptop without a mouse, and comparable to macbooks.
Execellent audio output
Comes with super fast charging.

Cons:

Quite warm under heavy load. Had to place it on a table or hold it at the trackpad area.
Battery life is shorter as compared to the Macbooks. (more of a Intel isuue though)

Posted by Aras

- June 07, 2024, 12:58:10

JerryRigEverything should start testing thin laptops as well

Posted by Idiot Slayer

- June 07, 2024, 08:43:49

Sir you are the biggest idiot i've ever seen on the internet

Posted by NikoB

- June 06, 2024, 22:11:13

I don't believe in PWM at 1440Hz for a typical AMOLED screen with a characteristic subpixel structure? If you actually increase the PWM to such a frequency, the panel will burn out in less than 5000 hours (which is 1-1.5 years of operation and that's it). Guaranteed.

I no longer trust NB's PWM tests and urge the editors to publish the usual "pencil test" on video instead. When changing brightness from 100% to 10%. And it will be immediately clear to everyone, without fiddling with the "oscilloscope," whether there is really visible flickering at low, operating brightness - refusal to post such a video in every review will only prove a fraud with test results.

Otherwise, a mediocre laptop with twice the price. A pitiful 32GB of slow (poorly efficient) RAM (apparently Huawei no longer has access to lpddr5 7500+ chips). Again, the moronic arrangement of 2xTB4, although Intel itself recommends placing them symmetrically on the left and right, but the morons in the development departments apparently think that they are smarter (no).
The lack of HDMI 2.1 and USB-a sharply reduces the comfort of use. As well as the lack of rj45 at 5gbps, in places where the only connection method is a cable network.

At the same time, the shameful Ultra 9 185H, even in PL2 mode, shamefully loses more than 2 times to the outdated 7840U in the AIDA64 Ray-Trace 64 test.

The noise will obviously be extremely unpleasant at the slightest load, because... The radiators here are for children, because... weight less than 1kg.

The result is a useless toy for strange adults who have extra easy money lying around in their pockets from somewhere. Why and for what purpose such a purchase is not clear.

Posted by Kouakuma

- June 06, 2024, 17:39:01

I would love to see this with the Snapdragon X elite, but who knows what are Huawei plans, maybe next year or something closer to the end of the year.

Posted by Redaktion

- June 06, 2024, 17:25:54

The MateBook X Pro is Huawei's flagship laptop and the new 2024 model has had its weight reduced to below 1 kg. In addition, its IPS screen has been swapped out for an OLED touchscreen that can achieve brightness levels of over 1,000 nits and offers an impressive picture quality.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Huawei-MateBook-X-Pro-2024-laptop-review-The-980-gram-magnesium-ultrabook-with-an-impressive-OLED-panel.844630.0.html

News: