News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by @usacomputer
 - October 19, 2024, 02:08:42
Looking forward to permanent blocking of paid shills like you
Posted by Huh
 - October 18, 2024, 14:27:05
The 265 smokes the 9950x, and u guys think the 285 is slower than the 265? What r u guys smoking?
Posted by MOTIONMAN
 - October 18, 2024, 01:46:22
I'm not waiting a year for Panther. Building a system next month with 285k. I'll be happy with better efficiency and won't even notice the slight drop in gaming performance. If I'm that desperate to gain a couple extra frames... I'll just OC it a bit on the ASUS Extreme mobo I'm getting.
Posted by usacomputer
 - October 17, 2024, 15:18:28
I don't think anyone is going to spend almost $600 on a processor and motherboard that in 10 months everything will change with NovaLake, it is one of Intel's policies that makes many people not buy Intel.
Quite the opposite with AM5, 7 years of updates without having to change motherboard, ram, etc....
In the forums they are waiting for the release of the AMD ZEN 5 9000x3D that they say has more performance, less temperature, less consumption.
Looking forward to seeing the Review.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 17, 2024, 13:25:38
The Intel Arrow Lake CPUs appear to be beastly multi-core chips as an entry in the SiSoftware database for the Core Ultra 7 265K shows a better performance score than the Ryzen 9 9950X. This is an interesting development since the Core Ultra 7 265K lacks hyperthreading.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Core-Ultra-7-265K-overtakes-Ryzen-9-9950X-in-leaked-benchmark-while-outperforming-Core-i7-14700K-by-29.902662.0.html