News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Teej
 - October 08, 2024, 08:59:38
My 14900K got a 4929 in passmark single
Posted by @man_daddio
 - October 07, 2024, 13:22:31
Quote from: ppapa on October 07, 2024, 06:11:53Pasmark isn't exactly a reputable benchmark.
Why, because social media says so?
Posted by Enma45
 - October 07, 2024, 12:31:01
INTEL COREL ULTRA 254K only 6% increase and ArrowLake 4% compared to their counterparts from last year seems shameful to me. AMD 13% more performance compared to their counterparts from last year.
FOR ANYONE WHO WANTS TO BUY A PC, with this processor you will only have 10 months for updates while with AMD and its AM5 platform you have 7 years of updates. GAMING PEOPLE ARE WAITING FOR AMD ZEN 5 9000X3d
Posted by Mr.Fox
 - October 07, 2024, 11:07:58
Crummy mutli-core performance is totally expected. When you do something super-stupid, like no hyperthreading, it's going to perform like a CPU with fewer cores. The CPU isn't playing with a full deck, just like the idiots that decided hyperthreading needed to go. That level of stupid can't be tolerated. They need to be fired, beaten and thrown in a dumpster.
Posted by ppapa
 - October 07, 2024, 06:11:53
Pasmark isn't exactly a reputable benchmark.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 06, 2024, 21:07:33
Intel's upcoming 'Arrow Lake-S' Core Ultra 9 285K desktop CPU boasts quite the punch in terms of single-threaded performance. Due to its lack of hyper-threading support, however, falls way back in the pack in multi-threaded scores, ending up losing not just to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, but also its own predecessor - the Core i9-14900K.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Arrow-Lake-S-Core-Ultra-9-285K-CPU-takes-the-top-spot-in-Passmark-s-single-threaded-performance-benchmark.898105.0.html