News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Teej
 - October 08, 2024, 08:59:38
My 14900K got a 4929 in passmark single
Posted by @man_daddio
 - October 07, 2024, 13:22:31
Quote from: ppapa on October 07, 2024, 06:11:53Pasmark isn't exactly a reputable benchmark.
Why, because social media says so?
Posted by Mr.Fox
 - October 07, 2024, 11:07:58
Crummy mutli-core performance is totally expected. When you do something super-stupid, like no hyperthreading, it's going to perform like a CPU with fewer cores. The CPU isn't playing with a full deck, just like the idiots that decided hyperthreading needed to go. That level of stupid can't be tolerated. They need to be fired, beaten and thrown in a dumpster.
Posted by ppapa
 - October 07, 2024, 06:11:53
Pasmark isn't exactly a reputable benchmark.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 06, 2024, 21:07:33
Intel's upcoming 'Arrow Lake-S' Core Ultra 9 285K desktop CPU boasts quite the punch in terms of single-threaded performance. Due to its lack of hyper-threading support, however, falls way back in the pack in multi-threaded scores, ending up losing not just to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, but also its own predecessor - the Core i9-14900K.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Arrow-Lake-S-Core-Ultra-9-285K-CPU-takes-the-top-spot-in-Passmark-s-single-threaded-performance-benchmark.898105.0.html