News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Bizzie
 - August 15, 2024, 02:19:58
Yes, there are some uphills on that route that's why It used 3% on the return trip instead of gaining charge.   
Posted by ArsLoginName
 - August 15, 2024, 00:06:16
I wish the author understood the reality of this as they consistently talk about 'altitude' throughout this article. Altitude is meaningless to an EV since it does not lose power or performance at any altitude since it does not depend on O2 for power (if I remember correctly, O2 levels decrease 3% for every 1000 ft gain in elevation above sea level). Further, due to reduced air density at elevation, the wind resistance is decreased and the efficiency (mile/kWhr of battery) would increase because there is less drag. Lastly, the drive from Boulder down the Front Range to I-70 is filled with hills so there had to be *some* consumption on the return trip.
Posted by Redaktion
 - August 13, 2024, 19:56:53
The team at TFLEV recently took a Lucid Air GT all the way to Loveland Pass at an elevation of 12,000 feet and back. The car managed an impressive efficiency of 4.2 miles/kWh over the 156-mile trip, all thanks to the engineering magic of regenerative braking. The $125,000 Lucid Air GT was also well-reviewed by the presenters, who praised the sedan's driving dynamics, ride comfort, fit and finish and most importantly - its impressive range.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lucid-Air-GT-consumes-just-3-of-battery-in-77-mile-downhill-drive-from-Loveland-Pass-thanks-to-regenerative-braking.874191.0.html