Quote from: DavidC1 on November 10, 2019, 02:48:22I don't put much trust in the "efficiency" of x86 and Intel, so far the only way I got acceptable battery life on a Windows device without a huge battery was through using the battery saver, and dealing with severe throttling and a barely legible screen brightness. Maybe it's my usage pattern I don't know but I'm not even gonna try a passively cooled Core device (the lag) at the moment, they're not Apple.Quote from: S.Yu on November 09, 2019, 21:07:13
There were devices this light, there were devices this thin, but this is probably the only one that's this light and this thin, but the 32Wh battery also sounds worst-in-class, I may have only seen such a small battery on 11" laptops and tablets.
Ehh, who cares?
The battery life is fantastic. This is the most efficient Core-based device I've seen. 31.9WHr and gets 8.5 hours battery life in web browsing and 10.5 hours in video playback!
Of course the multi-threaded performance isn't fantastic, and so is the graphics.
Quote from: S.Yu on November 09, 2019, 21:07:13
There were devices this light, there were devices this thin, but this is probably the only one that's this light and this thin, but the 32Wh battery also sounds worst-in-class, I may have only seen such a small battery on 11" laptops and tablets.