News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by NikoB
 - October 09, 2022, 15:19:21
The biggest shame in 2022 is the lack of video recording with 4k@60fps. Why the hell would anyone need optical stabilization in the shamefully obsolete 1080p for 7 years ago, if everything is in a mess and there is no details ?! And this at a monstrous price of 300 euros for some funny Snap 695! In Chinese smartphones for $100-120 6 years ago there was already a video recording in 4k@30Hz!

The only undoubted plus of this model is the flicker-free screen thanks to PLS (IPS), which allows you to read, surf and hang on it for many hours with the correct font size settings without harm to the eyes and nervous system.

Everything else is bad. As a photo/video camera model is outdated by 5-6 years. And this is the second most important function of any smartphone today.

Wi-Fi is shamefully slow, 2-3 times lower than normal for such a price.

RAM memory is completely INSUFFICIENT. Today's minimum is 8GB for modern versions of Android.

There is absolutely nothing to pay for. The brightness of PLS(IPS) is disgusting during the day. Suitable only for indoors or in cloudy weather.

Moreover, SAR is simply monstrous - it is highly not recommended to buy it for children and stupid people who go to bed with such a smartphone by putting it next to or under the pillow. And if we also recall the scandal with Samsung's deliberate underestimation of SAR on radiation checks by the regulatory authorities of different countries, like the Volkswagengate scandal, then everything becomes extremely dangerous for anyone who tries to constantly wear one on the body or often talk about it.
Posted by SCARed
 - October 08, 2022, 19:37:28
sorry, aber für 300€ ist das gerät einfach ein witz. dann lieber ein A52s, was man sehr häufig für 250€ bekommt. das bietet zudem OLED und der SD778 wischt mit dem 695 auch den boden auf.

ja, das A23 wird im preis fallen, aber für die komponenten dürften es aus meiner sicht nicht mehr als 200€ sein.
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 08, 2022, 15:08:11
Das Galaxy A23 5G macht gegenüber dem Vorgänger einen deutlichen Preissprung. Mehr Kameras, schnelleres Laden und ein etwas moderneres SoC sollen dafür entschädigen. Reicht das oder sind andere günstige 5G-Phones die bessere Wahl?

https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-Samsung-Galaxy-A23-5G-Smartphone-Kraeftiges-Mittelklasse-Handy-mit-OIS-Kamera.658754.0.html