Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Lokey

- February 16, 2022, 00:15:36

This shouldn't be terribly surprising. We already had official GPU tests back during the Qualcomm Day snapdragon release event in December.
The various leaks are from random people getting devices of unknown provenance.
The former have a history of presenting accurate information with regards to they soc.
The later is, obviously, a less reliable source.
Regardless, we won't know the details of all of this until AT produces their article.

Posted by ChrisGX

- February 15, 2022, 22:41:43

So, you know that the Xclipse 920 in the Exynos 2200 supports 'Infinity Cache' do you? With AMD RDNA2 APUs not getting Infinity Cache - a big investment in transistors and die space is required - how do you imagine a mobile SoC would get it?

Look, if you like living in an upside down world take statements by Erdi Özüağ as your guide but you'd be better off if you didn't. Mr. Özüağ's benchmark numbers could be correct but it would be safer if we double checked them.

Posted by Redaktion

- February 15, 2022, 18:29:42

YouTuber Erdi Özüağ who has access to both the Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 variants of the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra showed that the Xclipse 920 RDNA 2 GPU in the Exynos 2200 SoC puts up an underwhelming performance in benchmarks compared to the Adreno 730 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. While a future OTA update may potentially reduce the performance deltas, the possibility that Samsung's 4 nm process could be having an impact on the Xclipse 920's performance cannot be ruled out.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Snapdragon-8-Gen-1-s-Adreno-730-shown-to-be-43-faster-than-Exynos-2200-s-Xclipse-920-in-first-Galaxy-S22-Ultra-review-Samsung-s-4-nm-process-could-be-stifling-RDNA-2-clock-and-memory-performance.599758.0.html