Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Anonymousgg

- May 01, 2021, 10:30:08

Quote from: TFK on May 01, 2021, 06:48:47
Quote from: 8&8 on April 30, 2021, 19:42:13
slower becausehave they tested little cores?

even if they have tested BIG cores, can answer to the question: normal users how potentially use all powers of 10C of Rocket lake?

Normal users wont buy 10 core chips so this is irrelevant

Rocket Lake doesn't even have 10 cores, so no choice there.

Games and emulators can easily use 8 big cores. Anything after that is up to you. Some people can easily make the case for buying a 16-core 5950X, others are fine with 4 cores.

The hybrid Atom core approach seems reasonable, but the OS and the software have to handle it correctly. It's not a surprise that a benchmarking application might have trouble with it, months before launch.

Posted by TFK

- May 01, 2021, 06:48:47

Quote from: 8&8 on April 30, 2021, 19:42:13
slower becausehave they tested little cores?

even if they have tested BIG cores, can answer to the question: normal users how potentially use all powers of 10C of Rocket lake?

Normal users wont buy 10 core chips so this is irrelevant

Posted by Ssgsdhgzzfhczxvvvc

- May 01, 2021, 05:27:39

This has to be one of the lowest ever article I have ever seen. Dude, you are basing this on two sentences written by a person on a korean forum. Wtf?

Posted by Anil Ganti

- May 01, 2021, 02:01:42

Quote from: Eric on April 30, 2021, 23:39:55
From the introduction:

"and cost significantly lesser than Intel"

Fixed. My bad. Muscle memory kicked in.

Posted by Eric

- April 30, 2021, 23:39:55

From the introduction:

"and cost significantly lesser than Intel"

Posted by 8&8

- April 30, 2021, 19:42:13

slower becausehave they tested little cores?

even if they have tested BIG cores, can answer to the question: normal users how potentially use all powers of 10C of Rocket lake?

major clients surf on net, watch YT and stay always on social media, and sometimes play (if they don't use their mobiles) but the rest of 50% of cores are never used.

See M1 on iMac is the perfect answer to this question. With high frequency of RAM/ faster M.2 NVME is irrilevant.

Posted by Redaktion

- April 30, 2021, 15:46:54

A South Korean Tech forum post claims that Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake processors at 40% slower than initially anticipated. It also says that Intel's XE DGPU will come with at least 6GB of VRAM and cost significantly lesser than Intel and AMD graphics cards

https://www.notebookcheck.net/New-rumour-suggests-that-Alder-Lake-is-slower-than-initially-anticipated.536166.0.html