News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by DragonFox
 - January 28, 2021, 19:23:59
Quote from: ilikegames on January 19, 2021, 14:18:25The reality is only the GTX line makes sense when it comes to productivity/gaming and the MX line albeit, not terrible but certainly doesn't give the consumer the most bang for its buck.

You forgot about the Quadro for the professional side, but i agree.

That being said, Quadro has some garbage too. like the M1200 which i'm currently borrowing while waiting for a new CAD system.
This thing is barely any faster than a gt950 on a good day. Usually it's similar to a 940m from my testing. The only difference is that certain software work better with Quadro's
Posted by ilikegames
 - January 19, 2021, 14:18:25
Quote from: Sorin on January 11, 2021, 19:59:28
I don't get it. Why put an underpowered GPU to a laptop, when a well powered  Xe ipgu can outperform it with a GT1050 like performance (Witcher 3 medium settings in Schenker Vision/Intel NUC M15 review). Oh i see ...for the hefty price tag.

yeah and also to market, it has a "dedicated gpu". The uneducated buyer will see this and think to himself/herself, "Wow, a GPU! I must BUY this" The reality is only the GTX line makes sense when it comes to productivity/gaming and the MX line albeit, not terrible but certainly doesn't give the consumer the most bang for its buck.
Posted by ilikegames
 - January 19, 2021, 14:04:04
Honestly this is a good progress by Nvidia. It seems like that they are making some dang upliftment in the lower segment of the laptop market. I am dubious about the "midrange" term for an MX GPU but nonetheless, it is clearly faster than a desktop GT 1030. Although I have to say, it would have been much better if they had released this product 2 years prior as this kind performance is only applicable if the integrated solution isn't powerful enough. Good work AMD & Intel, keep up the competition! I love being a customer if this continues.
Posted by Dorby
 - January 12, 2021, 02:26:41
An indicator in the reviews' graphics under specifications tab, that shows which version of dGPUs and TGP a laptop is using would be very helpful in the future reviews.
Posted by S.Yu
 - January 11, 2021, 20:28:36
Though it's slightly amusing to see a 1650 run fine at such a low TGP (probably the lowest I've seen from a discrete GPU), I wouldn't call this midrange at all. The current midrange should be the 1660-1660Ti. If it starts with "MX", it's not meant to be midrange.
Posted by Sorin
 - January 11, 2021, 19:59:28
I don't get it. Why put an underpowered GPU to a laptop, when a well powered  Xe ipgu can outperform it with a GT1050 like performance (Witcher 3 medium settings in Schenker Vision/Intel NUC M15 review). Oh i see ...for the hefty price tag.
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 11, 2021, 18:22:15
Asus uses the most current technology in the ZenBook 14: A Tiger Lake processor, GeForce MX450 graphics core, 16 GB of working memory (quad-channel mode), and Thunderbolt 4. A 63-Wh battery ensures a good battery life.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/12-Watt-GeForce-MX450-beats-the-25-Watt-GeForce-MX350-Testing-the-Asus-ZenBook-14-UX435EG.514186.0.html