News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Alex Alderson
 - July 02, 2019, 11:36:07
Quote from: meh on June 30, 2019, 08:54:52
Stopped reading after APU, the author is ignorant and doesnt know they are CPUs not APUs

You didn't get far then, as I used APU in the second sentence.

On a serious note, thanks for pointing that out. That was a gap in my knowledge and I have corrected the article accordingly.

All the best,
Posted by meh
 - June 30, 2019, 08:54:52
Stopped reading after APU, the author is ignorant and doesnt know they are CPUs not APUs
Posted by Eh
 - June 29, 2019, 17:09:40
"APU" is used multiple times in the article when the Ryzen 9 is a CPU with no iGPU in it (so a normal non-APU CPU)
Posted by Redaktion
 - June 29, 2019, 13:02:15
The upcoming 12 core and 24 thread Ryzen 9 3900X has posted seriously impressive Geekbench 4.3 and SiSoftware multi-core scores, leaving the Core i9-9900K and even the Threadripper 2950X in its wake. The benchmark results confirm that the APU will have a 3.8 GHz base clock that it can boost to between 4.51 and 4.54 GHz.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-Ryzen-9-3900X-eats-Intel-and-Threadripper-processors-for-breakfast-lunch-and-dinner-in-multi-core-benchmarks.426683.0.html