Quote from: Rrussell263 on June 22, 2024, 02:58:51I would post the link to it, but the site is refusing to allow me to post links.
Quote from: RobinLight on June 22, 2024, 01:59:29Quote from: Rrussell263 on June 22, 2024, 00:58:08When i had an asus laptop with the 7845HX, i set the power limit to 50 watts and reduced voltage by .3 points, whereupon it was able to hit 22000 multicore and 1.6k single core in R23. That's a good chunk faster than this CPU despite it being 3 years older, alongside lower thermals due to the better heatsink design. The funny part? It cost me 1000$ vs the asking price of this laptop at 1270$. I also had a 20W limited preset- that still wiped the floor with the Snapdragon. 16000MC 1300SC.
😂😂😂😂
That's a lot of nonsense. First, the 12-core 7845HX has been introduced in 1/2023 while the first devices were available in March... so it's barely more than a year old rather than 3.
Second, you have no idea how TDP settings work. This is a Dragon Range desktop CPU in a notebook! You should measure the full system power drain from the socket like NBC does it to see what's really going on. Little hint: Under multi-core load like Cinebench this CPU easily sucks 200 Watts energy (no graphics, just CPU and system)!
Even my more modern 4nm 7840HS Phoenix with 8 cores having a TDP of 35W sucks up to 100W from the socket.
So until Zen 5 there is no competition in true mobile notebooks for X-Elite.
Quote from: Rrussell263 on June 22, 2024, 00:58:08When i had an asus laptop with the 7845HX, i set the power limit to 50 watts and reduced voltage by .3 points, whereupon it was able to hit 22000 multicore and 1.6k single core in R23. That's a good chunk faster than this CPU despite it being 3 years older, alongside lower thermals due to the better heatsink design. The funny part? It cost me 1000$ vs the asking price of this laptop at 1270$. I also had a 20W limited preset- that still wiped the floor with the Snapdragon. 16000MC 1300SC.
Quote from: Neenyah on June 21, 2024, 02:56:40The Phawx did a whole extensive video at different power limits. The X Elite beats nothing at any Watt-level
He literally shows in multiple measurements and benchmarks that performance per Watt is not better than on x86. The mentioned 8840U is demolishing it at any W you set - and it produces less heat.
Quote from: RobinLight on June 21, 2024, 02:47:00Quote from: Neenyah on June 20, 2024, 14:05:48Slightly worse battery life than Meteor Lake despite having larger battery and less performance.
Gets obliterated in every single regard at any power limit by all Ryzen 8000 CPUs, especially the 8840U.
Worse performance per Watt than both Meteor Lake and Ryzen 8000/7000.
GPU slower than Iris Xe 96 EU 🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇
And my favourite - 57.2 dB(A) fan noise is simply hilarious 😂😂 It gets louder (and hotter) than much more powerful gaming laptops.
Impressive feat by Qualcomm. "The PC reborn" as they said, lmao.
Sorry, but what you are doing here is really painful, is it the American fake news style I've heard of?
You just picked some random facts without context or didn't you read the article?
The maximum noise level is only an issue when you pick the highest power setting for around 50 Watt. Here, it smashes the whole x86 competition!
In balanced mode at 35 Watt it's already beating the 8845HS at 54 Watt, so we don't even need to start talking about efficiency here. Your 8840U would not stand a chance even when putting the X Elite in silent mode.
And you may have heard, OLED display suck when it comes to power consumption and battery life time. Let's see further reviews before doing any conclusions.
Plus: Have a look on NBCs new efficiency article and see how wrong most of your statements are.
Furthermore the GPU is not slower than Iris. It's only an issue when Emulation is required. And of course there are tons of issues in games where Intel had years to optimize their drivers. Do you remember the disastrous performance when Intel's ARC got released?
Quote from: Neenyah on June 21, 2024, 17:52:13There, terrible in everything but light usage such as surfing the web, watching movies etc. (any phone or tablet is equally good for that purpose for much lower priceNo. Screen size is critical in such tasks. On a smartphone, you can only watch simple sites based on the amount of information simultaneously visible on the screen. Just like on tablets, even 13". Real comfort starts at 16" 16:10. No. Screen size is critical in such tasks. On a smartphone, you can only watch simple sites based on the amount of information simultaneously visible on the screen. Just like on tablets, even 13". Real comfort starts at 16" 16:10. Nothing can replace a 15.6"+ screen and a full keyboard.
Quote from: 1806X on June 21, 2024, 17:15:22Yes, yes, everything is full of ARM-native Windows apps. Keep coping that Qualcomm's bs. Like this: https://imgur.com/a/rfJrfTYQuote from: Neenyah on June 21, 2024, 02:56:40So it is not slower except it's slower always (because pretty much everything is emulated/translated)? Ok.
"Pretty much everything is emulated/translated"?
What a nonsense. First inform, then write.
Quote"It is great, it is great, it is actually flattering to Qualcomm to come to this new space and prove ourselves as a leader in compute, and see all the competitors now benchmarking themselves against Qualcomm"
"The PC is truly reborn. It's the new era for PC and that is happening with a combination of Snapdragon X Elite and Copilot+. We are really making history together and the industry is actually taking notice."
"The personal computing experience is being redefined."
"It is all about delivering this whole new experience, with multiple days of battery life, unparalleled performance, and the efficiency to accelerate productivity and creativity"
Quote from: Neenyah on June 21, 2024, 02:56:40So it is not slower except it's slower always (because pretty much everything is emulated/translated)? Ok.
Quote from: RobinLight on June 21, 2024, 02:47:00In balanced mode at 35 Watt it's already beating the 8845HS at 54 Watt, so we don't even need to start talking about efficiency here. Your 8840U would not stand a chance even when putting the X Elite in silent mode.
Quote from: RobinLight on June 21, 2024, 02:47:00Furthermore the GPU is not slower than Iris. It's only an issue when Emulation is required.So it is not slower except it's slower always (because pretty much everything is emulated/translated)? Ok.
Quote from: Neenyah on June 20, 2024, 14:05:48Slightly worse battery life than Meteor Lake despite having larger battery and less performance.
Gets obliterated in every single regard at any power limit by all Ryzen 8000 CPUs, especially the 8840U.
Worse performance per Watt than both Meteor Lake and Ryzen 8000/7000.
GPU slower than Iris Xe 96 EU 🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇
And my favourite - 57.2 dB(A) fan noise is simply hilarious 😂😂 It gets louder (and hotter) than much more powerful gaming laptops.
Impressive feat by Qualcomm. "The PC reborn" as they said, lmao.
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar