Unpopular opinion, but beyond everything else the 13" 3:2 display is an instant deal breaker for me.
Cannot imagine trying to watch a 21:9 film on this laptop when a 15" 16:9 already feels crammed. Also no chance of using Windows Snap for multitasking, which is a must-have feature. For the extremely rare occasion when I want vertical space, 16:9 on 2-in-1 design is far more practical than traditional clamshell 3:2.
Also design of USB-C on this laptop entirely defeats the purpose of it. Both ports should have supported power delivery and displayout, with at least one of them including 10Gbps 3.1 that has been a standard for years now.
Only time I use USB-C port is for an eGPU which requires TB3. All two dozen of my peripherals including - keyboard, mouse, hard drives, flash drives, phone, speakers etc - have a male USB-A port at the other end, not USB-C. In fact, the sole tech that actually relies on USB-C is the laptop itself, which again, defeats the point of USB-C altogether.
42 Wh battery is a bit small as well, I assume 5 hours out of the box. My ancient T440s from 2013 could pull 12 hours, as could most high-end ultrabooks today with 70+ Wh batteries.
Other personal deal breakers include the keyboard and fixed RAM, as well as most likely poor speakers at this price range.
Not a bad laptop overall, but I wouldn't pay over $700 for the i5. Only Huawei does not even seem to offer i5 with MX150 and higher RAM options.